Exact words were said numerous times in Apple's lineup over the years. I don't think this is like Vision Pro however

Do they also not trust their code review processes?

Have you considered that they do trust their code review processes, and that they don't trust the generated code because it doesn't pass their process?

> they don't trust the generated code because it doesn't pass their process

That's not a credible scenario. Developers can either make changes by hand, or by asking an LLM, which is the common process when there is a downstream failure. Humans dont metaphorically throw their hands up and say "well the tool doesn't meet our expectations at every scale so we're not going to use it". Granted, most developers scale back how much they rely on it based on experience (good and bad).

That's very much a credible scenario. I think I use code from SO in a single digit of occasions. But I use it a lot more for giving me insight like a keyword for doing a proper web search. Or the name of a flag for a cli command, or the general shape of an algorithm or what to check in a troubleshooting session.

I won't generalize, but it's very rare for me to need code as most of my diffs are either boilerplate (generated with a tool or copied from docs or samples) or core logic that is mostly the translation of some design that I've already spent hours or days on. My core issue has always been incomplete specs from Product or incomplete docs for some tool/sdk/library (alleviated by having access to the source code).

Generated code is just not that useful, especially when designing the core architecture of a new project. And later it's not that useful either as the specs (why and how) is more valuable than any code (what).

Brilliant. I also like "health-related bankruptcy protection"

They're deliberately weakening the U.S. Treason.

Had to look this up: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmKoC57UWUI

Where specifically do you think they lack, and what do you suggest they focus on?

Technically they are outstanding.

Watching the recent I/O event though, it was frustrating how much they were copying Apple.

Compete with Garmin instead of Apple.

Garmin has less than 8% of the market versus Apple with 23% and the largest share. Why would they compete with the market loser?

is this an app? web tool?

It is a free web app and installable PWA, not a native App Store application. The parent manages the shelves in a browser; the child signs in once on their device and can add KidScreen to the Home Screen.

Why?

Those are some very Senior lowers

Thought there would be something interesting here about building for key gaps in a specific market vs innovating and finding long term product market fit.

But all I see are simple made up stats and high school guidance counselor level advice.

You'd be surprised at how many startup founders don't calculate the probabilities of different outcomes and are not at all aware of said high school guidance counselor advice