Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | croes's commentslogin

That means nothing, see

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49662990

> I spent $220 on Google app ads. 60% of the installs were robots


It also tops Apple App store. Any similar tidbit about installs being bots for Apple?

don't trust this we've spent hundreds of dollars without any effect whatsoever in the statistics

My point is not the money spend but that bots not only create traffic on web sites but also app stores

Sold for a full price, so it’s a sold product.

Game console dev kits are typically _more_ expensive than the consoles they're for. So "full price" isn't a good argument. (The fact that they were available to the public is a stronger argument.)

i've never had the luxury of buying a cheaper dev kit. Ever.

It wasn't though, a full price would have been more, to cover not just components and assembly but the cost of R&D.

Game console dev kits usually cost more than the consoles they're for, not less. They're not mass produced at the scale that the consoles are, and they're sold or leased to companies expecting to make several orders of magnitude more back off the products they create with the dev kits.

There isn't a very direct comparison of Oculus products to game consoles like PlayStation, Nintendo, XBox, or those in the distant past. It is interesting, and they have a lot of the same market forces at play, but I don't think they behave by the same rules.

There's at least one way where there's a direct comparison: they both have dev kits.

But should you see that if you just use it as as service?

you won't unless you deliberately try to read all that stuff

But should the AI simply obey?

Unless there is a reason not to. Giving the user the contents of their own sandbox is fine if you're supposed to let them run anything in it to complete the requested tasks.

If the only purpose of the sandbox were to isolate the instance of the service the user used then it might be a different expectation.


As a user, yes please.

Did you read all the links?

Google search did the same and more than once the link didn’t contain what I searched for


US hardware with chips made in Taiwan created with European lithography systems?

Chips developed and controlled by the US. Taiwan is controlled by the US. Europe has no leverage.

Europe does not exist in AI. That is the sad truth, no need to try to pick hole in reality... It's quite healthy to listen to EU noise less because otherwise people tend to drink the kool-aid and believe that the EU (and Europe) is anywhere in most strategic developments (AI and related chips are particularly dire but also missed the boat on EV, struggling on renewables, nowhere in smartphones, etc). Yes, there is Arm so that's that (not in the EU).


It’s mutual dependency. The developed and controlled chips can’t be made without EU lithography.

And it doesn’t have to be a bad thing to not exist in AI given all the damage that is done by AI.


Maybe we shouldn’t act like the US aren’t dependent on the rest of the world. Let’s look at US debt

> overly burdensome regulatory bodies that are concerned about such things like how the top of my bottle cap functions

Better than a government that fears the word gay

> and how low i set my ac temp leads to an incredibly hostile business environment and stagnant culture.

You are quite a cherrypicker, aren’t you?

How about the regulation to have USB-C as a standard or replaceable batteries.

Or one of my favorites, the ban of ingredients that cause cancer.

BTW ever heard of Frauenhofer IIS or ASML?


Are these the same companies that claim that companies are people?

They exist to make money but not by all means.

Companies are allowed to make money because it’s a net benefit for society.

If that changes companies lose their reason of existence.


Given the training data isn’t that more a win for the wisdom of the crowd?

Left behind what?

If AI works as promised coming late to the game is an advantage.

How many tricks for prompts are already obsolete, how many tools, harnesses etc. are already replaced by better alternatives?

It’s the difference between knowing a foreign language and only using a translator.

The former changes you brain structure and your way of thinking, the latter don’t.


Yea. I've evaluated these AI development patterns 3-4 times over the past year while applying for jobs.

I've been told by currently employed engineers that I was at state of the art development after a week of using them each time.

This also seems to have played out in hiring as every interview I've managed to pull has been completely schizophrenic with the interviewers wanting me to show AI fluency(for whatever that means) and then seemingly panicking mid way through as I start using the AI that can immediately solve the bog standard interview questions and then switch to having me manually build things.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: