I think its actually deliberately slow. They dont want people automating activity like mass messaging, or mass commenting on stuff

How do we know if this is normal or not? You really need a historical time series to know if it has always been like this or not

Historically the ad was in a newspaper and you would sit and circle them with your breakfast while listening to the wireless.

Companies didnt pay to put the ad in the paper every day once the vacancy was filled.

Hey, historically your "employer" would flog you if you tried to change "jobs".

HR was much better at "employee retention" historically.

Job postings in the past were made in places with relatively limited space hence higher costs.

The internet has turned the cost of the vast majority of job postings to almost nothing.

Based on that information you tell me how you think the incentives will work?

First, define AI agent.

Learned this the hard way yesterday. Spent $250 on tokens that ran out after just a day. Meanwhile my $100 sub lasted me a week with the same exact work

And the number of websites with ChatGPT ad trackers is on track to be doubled from last month.

according to Bloomberry: https://bloomberry.com/data/chatgpt-ads/

I know it's prejudice, but anytime I click on a Profile and see either of those 2 countries, I immediately hit back and never ever respond/contact that person ever again. It sucks to be an actual good person from those countries, but I don't wanna be scammed

This is not a good defence against being scammed. Like if this is part of your strategy on not getting scammed you should probably go back to the drawing board.

In other words, you’re defense strategy against being scammed should survive talking to someone from these places

Perhaps this is not their entire defense strategy, just the first layer?

I dont know. If u knew how to fight someone, and defend yourself would you still put yourself in situations where you would need to fight someone? You would avoid them in the first place, and then use it if you absolutely have to

I didnt even know there was a 4th movie

What part is hysterical? Because i find it educating and a helpful reminder, as I tend to be impatient and take small sips when its hot

Does this include people who died from 9/11 related diseases? If so, that number is 0

It would be interesting to see the numerical results both ways to see the effects with and without 9-11 induced fatal diseases.

I have not met a single person/company that uses Devin… does anyone here actually use it?

Unfortunately yes. It's awful, other than that they at least support both open-weight and proprietary models to route to. So I guess their model router is "fine", but the harness? As I said in a sibling thread on this page:

> Devin CLI is easily the worst-in-class coding harness I've ever been subjected to using, rife with bugs (up to and including dropping answers to the question tool), so I can't say I'm exactly inspired to try anything else the company produces.

I pay for it (mostly because they grandfathered me from the old prices)!

I used to use windsurf as my main editor until they changed their pricing model. Now i use it just to burn my weekly tokens on fable/astra if i remember to that on a task and that's it.

I only used their "DeepWiki" automatic docs, they are pretty decent at getting an overview of a large project and are relatively accurate, with diagrams and anything. Haven't tried out their coding agent stuff.

My company uses it. We have a bunch of seats in an enterprise plan and have been using it for 9 months or so.

It's a great product compared to Copilot. It is also the first AI tool I used heavily outside of creating random images or one off questions.

I'm now using all three, Devin, Claude, Codex. I'm finding Claude and Codex to be much better. One of my biggest gripes is that the web client and desktop client for Devin are two completely different harnesses, so the quality of responses varies greatly.

I use it, and have been happy with it for the most part. Like sibling, I use it for GPT-5.6-Sol and Opus work, and use their free models (GLM 5.2 for the past few months, trying SWE-2 now).

my friends at infosys are being trained on it

Deeply unserious company so not surprising